Taejeong Choi1, ChangGwon Dang2, Gyeonglim Ryu1, Dusan Kim1, Hyeongwook Baik2, Chanhyeok Park3, Yangmo Koo3, Sangchul Park3, Jihwan Lee1*
1Dairy Science division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Cheonan 31000, Korea
2DAnimal Breeding and Genetics Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Cheonan 31000, Korea
3Dairy Cattle Department, Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 06668, Korea
Correspondence to Jihwan Lee, E-mail: leejh6730@korea.kr
Volume 8, Number 4, Pages 127-133, December 2024.
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genomics 2024, 8(4), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.12972/jabng.20240405
Received on 11 October, 2024, Revised on 16 December, 2024, Accepted on 16 December, 2024, Published on 31 December, 2024.
Copyright © 2024 Korean Society of Animal Breeding and Genetics.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).
This study was conducted to analyze the pedigree information of the Korean Jersey dairy cattle breed and to determine how the inbreeding coefficient is changing. A total of 3,624 pedigree data for 976 Jersey cows were used for the analysis, and the pedigree completeness index (PCI) and inbreeding coefficient by birth year were calculated and compared. As a result of the PCI analysis, PCI1, PCI3, and PCI5 were all over 90%, confirming that the pedigree information was well managed. However, the inbreeding coefficient analysis results confirmed that the inbreeding coefficient exceeded 5% after 2020 and increased by 0.2% every year. In particular, after 2020, the proportion of individuals born through embryo transfer and artificial insemination using domestically produced embryos increased. The decrease in the number of individuals used as sire compared to the number of mating heads at that time was found to be one of the reasons for the increase in the inbreeding coefficient of the Jersey breed. In order to develop the sustainable Jersey breed industry, it is necessary to continuously manage pedigree and implement design mating program.
Jersey, pedigree, inbreeding coefficient
본 성과물(논문)은 농촌진흥청 연구사업(과제번호: PJ015006)의 지원에 의해 이루어진 것임.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article is reported.
González-Recio, O, López de Maturana E, Gutiérrez JP. 2007. Inbreeding depression on female fertility and calving ease in Spanish dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 90:5744-5752.
[DOI][PubMed]
IETS (The International Embryo Technology Society). 2022. 2021 Statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. Embryo Technology Newsletter. 40(4): 22-40.
Koo YM, Alam M, Park M, Lee S, Lee D, Dang CG, Rho SH, Lee KH, Choi TJ. 2021. Estimation of pedigree completeness index, inbreeding coefficient and effective population size of breeding stock for Hanwoo cows. Jornal of Animal Breeding and Genomics. 5(3): 73-83.
[DOI]
Krostensen T, Jensen C, Østergaard S, Weisbjerg MR, Aaes O, Nielsen NI. 2015. Feeding, production, and efficiency of Holsten-Friesian, Jersey, and mixed-breed lactating dairy cows in commercial Danish herds. Journal of Dairy Science. 98:263-274.
[DOI][PubMed]
Lehmkuhl JF. 1984. Determining size and dispersion of minimum viable populations for land management planning and species conservation. Environmental Management. 8(2): 167-176.
[DOI]
Lim DH, Mayakrishnan V, Lee HJ, Ki KS, Kim TI, Kim YH. 2020. A comparative study on milk composition of Jersey and Holstein dairy cows during the early lactation. Journal of Animal Science and Technoloty 62(4): 565-576.
[DOI][PubMed][PMC]
MacCluer J, Boyce B, Dyke L, Weitzkakmp D, Pfenning A, Parsons C. 1983. Inbreeding and pedigree structure in Standardbred horses. Journal of Heredity. 74:394-399.
[DOI]
MAFRA (Ministry of Agiculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2023. Milk and Dairy product production and consumption in 2023. MAFRA, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
Makanjuola BO, Miglior F, Abdalla EA, Maltecca C, Schenkel FS, Baes CF. 2020. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle population. Journal of Dairy Science. 103:5183-5199.
[DOI][PubMed]
Meuwissen THE and Luo Z. 1992. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large population. Genetics Selection Evolution. 24:305-313.
[DOI][PMC]
Miglior, F. 2000. Impact of inbreeding-Managing a declining Holstein gene pool. 10th World Holstein Friesian Federation Conference, 108-113.
Olthof L, Domecq J, Bradford B. 2023. Analysis of Jersey versus Holstein breed profitability on north central US dairies. Journal of Dairy Science. 4:344-348.
[DOI][PubMed][PMC]
Palladino RA, Buckley F, Prendivile R, Murphy JJ, Callan J, Kenny DA. 2010. A comparison between Holstein-Friesian and Jersey dairy cows and their F1 hybrid on milk fatty acid composition under grazing conditions. Journal of Dairy Science. 93:2176-2184.
[DOI][PubMed]
Srikanth K, Neupane M, Jaafar MA, Wolfe CW, Huson HJ, Van Tassell CP, Blackburn HD. 2022. Genetic diversity and inbreeding in US Jersey population and germplasm collection. Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP). DOI:10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_243
[DOI]
Stachowicz K. Sargolzaei M, Miglior F, Schenkel FS. 2011. Rate of inbreeding and genetic diversity in Canadian Holstein and Jersey cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 95:5160-5175.
[DOI][PubMed]
Thomson JR, Everett RW, Wolfe CW. 2000. Effect of inbreeding on production and survival in Jerseys. Journal of Dairy Science. 2131-2138.
[DOI][PubMed]
Won JI, Dang CG, Lim HJ, Jung YS, Im SK, Lee JK, Kim JB, Cho MR, Min HL, Yoon HB. 2016. Analysis of pedigree structure and inbreeding coefficient for performance tested Holstein cows in Korea. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science. 50(2) 107-116.
[DOI]